Simplified Edition · Module 03
Neuropsychology
Paradigms run first and read about second, plus the logic that turns a pattern of deficits into a claim.
- 12 activities
- 5 to 7 minutes each
- 70 minutes end to end
The activities
In teaching order
-
Double Dissociation Detective
Dissociation logic, control-referenced inference and what measurement precision entitles you to claim
7 min
-
How Sure Can One Case Make You?
Why a single lesion case supports much less localisation inference than it feels like
6 min
-
Network Disconnection Mapper
How a deficit can come from a cut connection rather than from damage to any region
5 min
-
Neglect or Blindness?
Telling neglect from field loss, and why the obvious task is the wrong one
6 min
-
Where the Cut Is
How the shape of a field defect locates the damage that caused it
5 min
-
What Each Profile Can Decide
Which claims a case can settle, and which it cannot settle however severe it is
6 min
-
Which Measure Separates Them?
Why the useful measure is the one the two candidates differ on, not the one either scores lowest on
6 min
-
What One Score Hides
Why a single executive score cannot say what is wrong, and what the pattern across tasks adds
6 min
-
Building a Split-Brain Trial
The four conditions the classic split-brain result needs, and what happens when one is removed
6 min
-
Where Recognition Breaks
Why recognising a face, knowing who someone is, and producing their name can fail separately
5 min
-
What Your Battery Cannot Say
Why the useful half of an assessment report is the list of what was not assessed
6 min
-
What Is the Score Actually Made Of?
What a rising recovery score is actually made of, and how much of it generalises
6 min
Elsewhere
Every activity here has a full-length twin in the main collection, linked from the foot of the activity itself.