Social and Critical Psychology

Epistemology Lens Switch

One fictional school, one reported rise in classroom disruption, and three starting points about what the social world is. Build a study from each and watch the object, the question, the evidence, the method and the defensible claim move together.

Fictional case - Meadowbank Academy, its figures and its documents do not exist

Learning objective

By the end you should be able to say what each of three epistemologies takes its research object to be, and why the method follows from that rather than the reverse.

About 30 minutes. Nothing you do here is saved or sent anywhere.

How to use this

  1. Commit to an answer to the question below.
  2. Declare a starting point, then make three decisions that build a study from it.
  3. Run the same case again from a different starting point, and compare what each study can say.

The case: Meadowbank Academy

A fictional 11-16 school of about 900 pupils. Referrals for "low-level disruption" rose from 260 to 412 between the autumn and spring terms, and senior staff have asked for research. In January the behaviour policy changed: referral, previously discretionary, became the expected response to a second warning.

So nobody yet knows whether pupils are behaving differently. The log records staff referrals, not pupil behaviour, and the thing that most obviously changed is the rule about when to refer. The school's full evidence file sits inside the activity below, and it is the same file for every lens.

All figures are invented for teaching. They are not estimates of anything, and no real school, policy or dataset is described.

First, a judgement

Three research teams are given exactly the material above. They differ only in what they assume the social world is like and how it can be known.

What will differ most between the three studies?

What this demonstrates

Methods are usually taught as a toolbox: pick the technique that suits the question. That hides the step before it. All three teams held the same log, the same survey and the same policy change; what differed was what each took disruption to be, and that decision settled the question, the evidence and the claim before anything was collected. Choosing a method looks like the decision. It is the consequence of one already taken.

Download activity HTML

For teaching elsewhere: take this activity as one self-contained block of HTML, on the clipboard or as a file. Either way it is styled so that it will not disturb the page you put it into.