Neuropsychology
A referral question, ninety minutes and seventeen task types. Choose what to administer, then find out what your battery could and could not conclude.
Simulated - generic task descriptions, fictional referrals, no real tests and no scoring of anybody
By the end you should be able to select tasks from a referral question, and say which measures make the rest interpretable.
About 30 minutes across three referrals. Nothing you do here is saved or sent anywhere.
Every task here is described generically - "learning and recalling a word list", not any published test. No real test, subtest, item, stimulus or norm is reproduced, no score is produced for anybody, and the durations are round teaching numbers rather than published administration times.
The three referrals are invented. Real assessment involves a history, an interview, informant report, observation across the session and a formulation, none of which a task list can carry. This activity is about the reasoning behind a selection, not about how assessment is actually done.
You have ninety minutes and a referral asking whether the memory problems a fictional person reports show up on testing. You have already chosen one good memory test.
Goal
| Task | Domain | What it measures | Minutes |
|---|
| Task | Domain | Minutes | Note |
|---|
Durations are round teaching numbers. No published administration time, norm or item is reproduced, and the task descriptions are generic on purpose.
A battery is a set of inferences, and the referral decides which ones are needed. That is why the tasks that answer nothing matter: a domain you expect to be intact, and a validity check, are what let you say a low score means what you think it means. Longer is not better, and two measures of the same thing are not waste.